Task 4: The diagrams below show the floor plans for a trade conference in 2009 and for the same trade conference in 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate some changes to the layout of a trade conference from 2009 to 2010.
Overall, this trade conference experienced considerable alters during the period shown. The most noticeable difference between the two maps is more seats and more display stands in 2010 than in 2009.
As can be seen from the maps, in 2009, the conference hall and the stage were placed on the left of the diagram while there are three meeting rooms located under the conference hall on the same side. The plan for 2010 shows that the conference hall and the stage were moved to the right, next to the balcony and three meeting rooms were knocked down. In 2010, the exhibition area was expanded and constructed on the original site of the old conference hall and stage with one door connected to the balcony and lounge.
Turning to other facilities, in 2009, the refreshments were located between the main entrance and the side entrance on the same side while a registration desk stood beside the balcony. In 2010, the registration desk and the refreshments were changed places with each other whereas a lounge was provided on the balcony. The main entrance and the side entrance remained unchanged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | thaoduong1902 | 67 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- More and more people today are choosing to eat only healthy food and are making time to exercise regularly Why is this What can be done to encourage other people to eat only healthy food and to make time to exercise regularly 73
- The diagram shows the different stages in the production of woolen goods 56
- The charts below give information on Internet use at home in Australia between 2010 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are the effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of people 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92610837438 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54502038942 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8985138196 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238827901594 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102739855434 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719651143901 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15393867235 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073651836111 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92610837438 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54502038942 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8985138196 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238827901594 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102739855434 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719651143901 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15393867235 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073651836111 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.