The charts below give information on Internet use at home in Australia between 2010 and 2011. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The charts show how the internet was used in Australia by sectors and by age groups from 2010 to 2011.
Overall, the proportion of home users using the internet for emailing was highest while the younger users used the internet for social networking more than the older.
Emailing was an activity that accounted for roughly more than 90% of all home internet users during the period shown. Social networking and paying bills online or online banking activities demonstrated a different pattern with the figure around 60% in general.
In terms of categorization by age group users, the figure for emailing was over 80% for each group of users. The young people who were from 15 to 24 years old used home the internet most for social networking, taking up about 90% compared with 80% and 60% among the 25-34 and the 35-44-year-old respectively. This figure fell gradually further for the other two age groups to around 20%. Around 40% of users among 15-24-year-old used home internet for paying bills online or online banking while the figures for other age groups were higher. Almost 80% of users of the 25-34 age group used the internet for this purpose.
- The diagrams show the structure of a solar panel and its use 67
- The diagrams show changes to a medical centre from 2008 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below describes the structure of a home smokery and how it works Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this case and what solutions are possible 78
- Task 4 The diagrams below show the floor plans for a trade conference in 2009 and for the same trade conference in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...e users using the internet for emailing was highest while the younger users used the intern...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91878172589 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48184419731 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497461928934 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7212258759 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108288237055 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609440017272 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626878174724 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102307517077 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669744381844 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.