The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile (cell phones) in a European country from January to September 2002, measured in euro.

The chart illustrates the cost of a monthly contract for four types of cell phones such as DOMO, LEX, SIM TX, Alpha from January to September 2002 in a European nation by euro. 

Overall, three of those had an upward trend like DOMO, LEX, and Alpha. However, SIM TX experienced a downward trend during the period.

To begin with, the Alpha started at 5 euros and rose slightly to 7 euros in the first four months. It dropped again in June but increased dramatically by 5 times between July and September. Whereas the DOMO had the highest cost at 15 euros, it went up in two months and declined in April. Those mobile phones had a stable rise to 25 euros in July then slightly fell at the end of the period. 

The Lex and SIM TX started with nearly the same figures in January. They decreased in February and increased steadily in May. While SIM TX significantly rose by 5 euro in June and progressively declined to under 10 euro in the final month, the Lex slightly fell in June then went up dramatically to 18 euro in September.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-12 Huyenlbg87 84 view
2023-03-26 TLan168 view
2023-03-24 TLan168 78 view
2023-03-24 TLan168 56 view
2023-03-24 TLan168 78 view
Essays by user TLan168 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ember 2002 in a European nation by euro.  Overall, three of those had an upward tr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... slightly fell at the end of the period.  The Lex and SIM TX started with nearly t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'euro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'euros'.
Suggestion: euros
...y. While SIM TX significantly rose by 5 euro in June and progressively declined to u...
^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'euro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'euros'.
Suggestion: euros
... and progressively declined to under 10 euro in the final month, the Lex slightly fe...
^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'euro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'euros'.
Suggestion: euros
...in June then went up dramatically to 18 euro in September.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, then, whereas, while, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47894736842 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52998089402 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563157894737 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6219046889 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226465599764 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081110560149 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101004589772 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164355893992 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182109704529 0.0819641961636 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ember 2002 in a European nation by euro.  Overall, three of those had an upward tr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... slightly fell at the end of the period.  The Lex and SIM TX started with nearly t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'euro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'euros'.
Suggestion: euros
...y. While SIM TX significantly rose by 5 euro in June and progressively declined to u...
^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'euro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'euros'.
Suggestion: euros
... and progressively declined to under 10 euro in the final month, the Lex slightly fe...
^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'euro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'euros'.
Suggestion: euros
...in June then went up dramatically to 18 euro in September.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, then, whereas, while, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47894736842 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52998089402 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563157894737 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6219046889 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226465599764 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081110560149 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101004589772 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164355893992 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182109704529 0.0819641961636 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.