Some people believe that oral communication is more effective than written communication. I partly agree with this assertion; while it may be true in the case of some societies, others seem to consider written form to be more powerful.
On the one hand, spoken words are more useful than written ones when it comes to a situation that requiring body languages and facial expressions. Take dating as an example, it is better to set up a face-to-face conversation with a person we have feelings for than just sitting at home and texting via devices. Moreover, spoken languages will give us a better understanding of the person we are communicating with. It will be easier to guess the true feelings of the person we are talking to directly through his or her expressions and gestures, however, it may be impossible to do that just by reading some messages.
On the other hand, written languages are better than spoken ones in some certain circumstances. For example, in some formal occasions such as weddings or ceremonies, a formal card is a great choice not only to comprehensively inform the guests of the events but also to express the consideration of the hosts. Additionally, in most of business cases, writing documents are required to keep track of the correspondence among relevant parties as valid evidence. In these cases, written contracts are considered as legitimate agreements in order to avoid confusion or conflict.
In conclusion, as the reasons have been mentioned above, verbal communication is more preferable in the situation that requires body languages while written form should be used in terms of formal events and business.
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07352941176 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05421563278 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569852941176 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1799475848 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.454545455 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214631327333 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088178374377 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758422670085 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135662527366 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515107523255 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.