the graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. the tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.
The provided graphs demostrate the figures for fast-drivers caught on speed camera and related fatal accidents. Tables illustrates people's opinions through the survey on the effectiveness, purpose and number of the cameras.
The first graph shows the number of speeding drivers in year 1 with 200,000 which rocketed in year 6 and went up till 1,5 million drivers fined for speeding in year 8. Accordingy, 60% of surveyed people agree that more speed cameras do not guarantee the road safety.
The graph two depicts data on accidents with lethal outcomes over the same period. Despite the fact of increased quantity of speed cameras, any significant change was not noticed. Throught the period, figures slightly vary just above 300,000. Related poll survey asking people the purpose of the cameras revealed that 70% think cameras serve for government revenue, while other 26% agree that they improve road safety. Another group of people (56%) believe that there are too many cameras on the roads.
In overall, it can be observed that "the more cameras, the fewer accidents" is not true. People's attitutes are mostly negative towards this issue due to the redundant amount of cameras that do not reduce road accidents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-02 | Karimova iroda | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | 81206Ecema | 62 | view |
| 2020-02-23 | mohamed3bed | 95 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | ngothanhnam2211 | 81 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23232323232 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53676165171 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646464646465 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4241462676 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1818181818 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.45454545455 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368435614633 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120016753271 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681446902993 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215976621272 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785685200003 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.