The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey of people’s opinion on the speed cameras.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
The chart shows that in the first year of speed cameras 200,000 drives were caught speeding.
Until the fifth year, the number of drivers who were caught by speed cameras rose steadily then, it started to rise dramatically. At the end of the eighth year, the number rose to 1,6 million. However, the number of road accident fatalities hardly changed at all. The first year the number was over 3,000 than in the fourth year it has dropped below 3,000 yet, after that it remained fairly a bit over 3,000 per year.
According to people’s opinions on speed cameras, most of them think that speed cameras do not reduce the number of accidents and only 32% of people think it does. And the majority of people think the main reason is to raise revenue and they think that the number of speed cameras on the road are too many.
The overall picture is that the rise in speed cameras did not make a difference in road accident fatalities. Because of that, people think the main reason is not to improve safety, it is for revenue and they think it is not effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-02 | Karimova iroda | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | 81206Ecema | 62 | view |
| 2020-02-23 | mohamed3bed | 95 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | ngothanhnam2211 | 81 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 67
- The diagram below shows the process for making a water clock Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK 67
- The table below shows the consumer durables telephone refrigerator etc owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57291666667 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.174639777 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7817980064 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398390862242 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169970657955 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719373558559 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23287962262 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564320530491 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.