The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What is the cause of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
The significant increase in final goods brings about numerous adverse impacts on the natural environment. Ironing out this severe damage is an uphill, but not impossible. This essay gives insight into the main causes and suggests some solutions to mitigate its detriment to the natural environment and the day-to-day life of human beings.
The consumer-goods are products bought for consumption by the average of consumer, so it is clearly shown that they cause detrimental environmental concerns in many ways. Firstly, the manufacturing of consumer goods releases hazardous air pollutants which can cause cancer, birth defects, or other serious harms. Moreover, they pose a serious threat to the ecosystem when the felling is carried out for the company construction, tissues, fuel, and even for the landfills to deposit the wastes including toxic wastes. That not only pushes some untamed animals to the brink of extinction on account of habitat loss but also leads to ecological imbalance. Secondly, the production of consumer goods is the root cause of ocean pollution. Many studies show that enormous amounts of marine trash breed severe conditions for marine creatures. Notably, marine trash encompasses all manufactured products including plastic items like shopping bags and beverage bottles, along with bottle caps, cigarette butts, food wrappers, and fishing gear. All these kinds of trash cause harmful impacts on ingestion, suffocation, and entanglement of hundreds of marine species such as seabirds, whales, fish, and turtles. For instance, they mistake waste for prey and die of starvation as their stomachs become filled with plastic and because those plastics are long-lasting, it is challenging to remove them from the ocean immediately. The unprecedented development of consumer products triggers natural concerns and climate impact. However, there are a few solutions that can help some nations confront this pressing problem. Firstly, governments can help citizens raise their awareness of numerous environmental issues caused by consumer products through social media so that consumers change their consumption habits to ensure that their purchasing does not harm the environment. Secondly, companies should be encouraged to promote sustainable consumption and production. Because building sustainability in consumption and production not only makes the basic needs but also brings a better quality of life by minimizing the use of natural resources and toxic materials as well as the emission of waste and pollutants over the life cycle of the service and product so as not to jeopardize the needs of the future generation. Thirdly, education is also a crucial element of setting a sustainable life for the young generation in the coming years. Lessons about the environment should be taught in every school and kindergarten. Consequently, the students may adopt sustainable practices at an early age.
In conclusion, despite the severe impacts of the unsustainable patterns of consumption and production, all nations should stiffen their resolve to confront this insurmountable problem instead of depriving the green life of the next generation. But from my perspective, dealing with this is an uphill, and high determination is required from not only the governments but also every individual worldwide
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-04 | DONGPHUONGANH | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | DONGPHUONGANH | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important Why might this be a case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What is the cause of this What can be done to solve this problem 56
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What is the cause of this What can be done to solve this problem 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1373, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'removing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: removing
...ics are long-lasting, it is challenging to remove them from the ocean immediately. The un...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.3376753507 348% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2826.0 1615.20841683 175% => OK
No of words: 506.0 315.596192385 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58498023715 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99993230042 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 176.041082164 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555335968379 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 867.6 506.74238477 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.176813293 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.454545455 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31818181818 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23611521084 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678210692455 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568184764895 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162017071333 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550495922602 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 78.4519038076 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.