Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
Technology is said to be the main factor which changes people’s interactions in many situations. I totally agree with this progress, and I would recommend this to be a profitable development.
Initially, thanks to four industrial revolutions, information technology has become an essential collaborator of everyone all over the world. Therefore, it has a considerable amount of effects on our lives. During the COVID-19 quarantine time, online communications have significantly been the main communicative type instead of those through offline. For instance, online classes, which are taken through many software programs such as: Google Classroom, Zoom, have proved that technology has changed our ways of communication. Besides, we can stay in touch with our relatives and our parents by making phone calls through Facebook Messenger, Snapchat even though we are living far away from them. As a result, the more technology affects our lives, the more comfortable they will become.
According to the positive effects above, I strongly think that technology has brought us such an uncountable number of benefits, especially telecommunications. Because of the convenience, people can easily contact anyone they want in just a few seconds. Not only can people have a faster way of communication, but also they will save their money effectively. For example, children living in other cities or countries do not have to spend money on such extravagant travel tickets to visit their parents because they have their online face-to-face calls. Especially, interactions by technology will have better adaptations individually if the COVID-19 pandemic has not been completely decreased.
In conclusion, people have received the changes of interactions because of technology. In many ways, which is positive, technology has affected our relationships and I think considerable advantages have been made from this in a hasty manner.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 61
- Some educationalists think that international exchange visits will benefit teenagers at the school To what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 56
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words You should sp 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a hasty manner" with adverb for "hasty"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ble advantages have been made from this in a hasty manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61643835616 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24741333616 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61301369863 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9139376307 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293996207094 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948220917973 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639745436963 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189754390836 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449973023966 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.