The charts show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first line chart compares the proportion of households in a specific country that owned electrical appliances in a century starting from 1920, while the second line chart illustrates how much time the average household in that country spent doing chores every week during the same period.
Overall, there was a significant growth in the population of families owning electrical appliances. however, at the same time, the amount of time spent on housework decreased.
In the first line chart, the washing machine was the most common of the three electrical appliances with ownership reaching 40% of households in 1920 and the second place was the vacuum cleaner with 30%. while almost no households owned refrigerators in that year, it increased rapidly and reached 100% in 2019. Likewise, the percentage of households that owned vacuum cleaners observed a significant growth during the same period and reached 100% at the end of the period. Meanwhile, there was a slight reduction in the rates of homes with washing machines from 70% in 1960 to around 60% in 1980, however, it resumed the rising trend and reached over 70% in 2019.
In the second one, in 1920, the amount of time spent doing housework was 50 hours per week per household, however, it declined gradually, to only 10 hours per week at the end of the period.
(221 words)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-27 | nguyenhuyendan1133 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-24 | Luis Pham | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | 60 | view |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | view | |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | view |
- The charts show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 67
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 78
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What is the reason for this How can people research this 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...res every week during the same period. Overall, there was a significant growth ...
^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... families owning electrical appliances. however, at the same time, the amount of time s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of time spent on housework decreased. In the first line chart, the washing mac...
^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... place was the vacuum cleaner with 30%. while almost no households owned refrigerator...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng trend and reached over 70% in 2019. In the second one, in 1920, the amount ...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urs per week at the end of the period. 221 words
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00888888889 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60841562999 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493333333333 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.952556468 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.875 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243497900265 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946554608531 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800001677209 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162539453863 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466415924138 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.