Some people argue that friends shape students. They cite to the fact that students spend their time more with the friends than their teachers. However, I disagree with them and believe that teachers influence the students more because of main two reasons which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, teachers are knowledgeable and experienced people, and therefore, can sway the behavior of the students. Teachers have broad information about the subject matters and can guide the students towards the right path. For example, when I was studying at grade 7, I used to play carrom-board a lot. At that time, my health teacher calmly motivated me not to play carrom; instead, he told me to play physical games like football and badminton which have great health benefits. Had he reprimanded me, he would not have been able to redirect my mind. By the years of expertise and knowledge, he was aware how to change mind of the students. So, teachers are more influential.
Similarly, teachers are role model for students. They can guide the student from darkness to light by mentoring the students and greatly attracting them towards their way of doing. My personal experience is the perfect example for this. When I was at grade 12, I was in dilemma about my career and university faculty. Hari, one of my teachers who used to teach part-time physics, was greatly fascinating. His way of thinking about the problems and solving them was astonishing. I was great fan of his attitude and finally wanted to study civil engineering like him. By this he had influenced me a lot and now finally I am working as a civil Engineer. Thus, teachers have great impact on the life of their students.
To recapitulate, because of the aforementioned reasons, I strongly believe that teachers are more influential than the friends.
- The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004 development along the coastal wetlands has been prohi 67
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 81
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their family for a longer time Which of these solutions do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the wellbeing of that country s citizens Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 60
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positio 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, similarly, so, therefore, thus, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93548387097 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75298721494 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4491426511 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242735577908 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757246427474 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095857760683 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181382176227 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133375657732 0.0645574589148 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.