Many people think there is a general increase in anti social behavior and a lack of respect for others What do you think are the causes of this and how to improve it What solutions can you suggest

Essay topics:

Many people think there is a general increase in anti-social behavior and a lack of respect for others. What do you think are the causes of this and how to improve it? What solutions can you suggest?

Today, in the technologically developing society, many a person could access into social networks easily so that a significant increase of anti-social behaviours and a lack of respect for other people might be expanded for those certain reasons. From my personal perspectives, the two main reasons for this matter such as simple approaching to the Internet and being lackable of human awareness of respects, those which will be elaborated towards the suggested solutions in details with the below explanation-essay.

On the first edge of notion, it is noticeable that many causes can currently lead to anti-society reactions; however, the popular reasons might be very easy to access the Internet and lack of ethics for respecting other persons. First of all, Vietnam is a country with expanded Internet network and lower fee than other developing ones; hence, most of the citizens can connect together on the Internet and reach daily information thoughtfully. To contrast, the information from the Internet may be fake or unofficial leading to create unsuitable reactions for others. For example, young learners can utilize laptops when they were children without being verified the appropriate information. Based on this, they can somehow gain wrong methods about the information and give out anti-social behaviours. The aim should be applied for the increase of Internet fee should be considered to create a polite viral environment with well-mannered citizens; also, there is a selection of participants when joining the Internet leading to have healthy atmosphere and avoid anti-social actions.

Being at the second reason, there are less of ethical classes to provide awareness and ethics from schools so that the young generation cannot pick the right behaviours. The current educational system is focusing on academic knowledge and forgetting to train soft skills in order to adapt suitable thoughts in the modern life. In terms of the suggestions to improve the problem, to my personal, the government should control Internet access capacity and innovate educational methodologies concentrating on ethical teaching. In addition, the innovation of teaching guideline should be applied for extra courses about ethical thinking and self-helped trainings; based on this, the young generation can approach the right behaviours when they were students and help to decrease anti-social reactions in the future. For instance, from the primary school system, governments can organize social classes with real-life activities to consolidate children's human awareness and train suitable reactions for respecting other people in society.

To sum up, anti-social manners might be a hot issue at present in many developing nations, the main causes are complicated Internet using and disrespecful acts towards humans which could lead to the unforeseen consequences directly to the society. Therefore, governments ought to consider taking advantage of Internet with the appropriate methods and improve educational structures for ethical teaching into nations.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-05 Luisjackiet 73 view
Essays by user Luisjackiet :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2605.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 461.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65075921909 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02162890619 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522776572668 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 799.2 506.74238477 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7916269259 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.666666667 106.682146367 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7333333333 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209982637898 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752174141296 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578762914137 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1349190978 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036149601415 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.