The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table and pie charts illustrate the changes in policy finance of different sources and how the money was expensed in one place of Britain from 2017 to 2018.
Overall, it is clear that all sources had an upward trend. While the national government was the primary source in both years that earned much money for the policy budget, the opposite was true for other sources (eg grants). In terms of distribution, the policy spent the majority on salaries.
In 2017, the policy of the national government was 175.5 million pounds, in comparison with local taxes, only 91.2 million pounds. However, following 1 year, both sources had risen significantly to 177.8 and 102.3 million pounds. Meanwhile, the policy finance of other sources (eg grants) was 4 times smaller than the national government, only 38 million pounds and this figure for other grants had grown slightly to 38.5 million pounds at the end of the period. Finally, the total policy budget in 2018 was higher than in 2017, at 318.6 million pounds in 2018 and only 304.7 in 2017.
Looking at the chart, the percentage of money spent on officers and staff in 2017 was 75% and the figure for money decreased slightly to 69% in 2018. Moreover, the policy distributed for buildings and transport was similar in 2 years, about 17%. And technology was expensed the least, only 8% in 2017, and then rose slightly by 6%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The line chart below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The charts below show the comparison of time spent in minutes per day by UK s Males and Females on household and leisure activities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line chart below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011 73
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1998 and in 2008 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79746835443 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39874809343 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523206751055 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9095221647 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.363636364 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192990150353 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826287706216 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08675822265 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155700527524 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917347515124 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79746835443 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39874809343 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523206751055 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9095221647 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.363636364 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192990150353 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826287706216 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08675822265 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155700527524 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917347515124 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.