The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given map demonstrate the current layout of Hunderstone town and a proposal diagram for further development.
Standing in the overview point of view, it is clearly seen that the proposed plan keeped most of the original layout of Hunderstone, with the addition of roads and several facilities for a better connection between areas of the town.
First of all, Road A2, the Town Center and the Railway remain unchanged. However, Road A4 was suggested to create a continuous connection between Road A2 and the Town Center. This would be beneficial for the goal of industrial development of Hunderstone, as the Air Field was replaced by an Industrial Estate in the new plan. This new infrastructure will allow a seamless flow from the Industrial Site to Hunderstone’s Center, with the help of the new Road A4.
Furthermore, a new roundabout was added on the intersection betern the road from the old roundabout on Road A2 and the Railway, decreasing the distance of travel from the industrial region to the town center. Shipping Carriers, as well as citizen now have the choices to select the route to traverse around Hunderstone, decreasing the traffic pressure on old roads.
- The graph below shows a survey result of 4000 participants who expressed what important aspects they have learned from the internship they have completed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 11
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 67
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, well, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98807152334 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3562309948 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122960187007 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621013069505 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560024545193 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981504887383 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613632049639 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, well, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98807152334 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3562309948 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122960187007 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621013069505 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560024545193 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981504887383 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613632049639 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.