Some children spend hour every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In today's world, mobile phones are used by all group of people as their basic needs. Many small children are also given different smart cells for most of hours. This trend has led to a debate regarding positive or negative development. In this essay, I will outline both views and put forward my opinion in the conclusion.
The world is developing in a high rate where the use of mobile phones have become very common nowadays. These helps children to be creative, socially active and competitive with the other higher level students. Smartphones can be used for many study, research, news and other productive things that contribute to gain knowledge. For instance, children with phones can learn online, can find a route with google maps, can get a meaning of any words they want to know. Spending more time on internet gives wide range of lesson to different prespective which rely on smartphones. The smartphones has made a world very small leading various positive aspects. Moreover, students nowadays can study their preferred course on smartphones by sitting in their home and get plenty of knowledge for their academic development.
On the other hand, smartphones most of the time give a way to physical, social and academic downfall to the users. It they are used for negative purpose it leads to failure of personal development. For example, if unwanted things are viewed and operated it slows down on the mind, generate problem in health and make students mentally weak. Maximum use of mobile phones for other reason rather than study will result bad academic performance along with negative impression in the society. Many children in these present days are addicted to phones which is a curse and if it is not avoided it will have a negative development in the society. Therefore maximum use of mobile phones can cause vital problems.
To conclude, to some extent it is positive development and some argue that it is negative, but in my opinion too much use of mobile phones can cause many problems and I personally agree using mobile phone excessively for a long period of time is a negative development.
- Some children spend hour every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the hours') or simply say ''most hours''.
Suggestion: most of the hours; most hours
...re also given different smart cells for most of hours. This trend has led to a debate regardi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun study seems to be countable; consider using: 'many studies'.
Suggestion: many studies
...l students. Smartphones can be used for many study, research, news and other productive th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 642, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... a negative development in the society. Therefore maximum use of mobile phones can cause ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ing mobile phone excessively for a long period of time is a negative development.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93854748603 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62622127206 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0144448515 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168444998071 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556557945001 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482398350391 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112952651577 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300697878792 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the hours') or simply say ''most hours''.
Suggestion: most of the hours; most hours
...re also given different smart cells for most of hours. This trend has led to a debate regardi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun study seems to be countable; consider using: 'many studies'.
Suggestion: many studies
...l students. Smartphones can be used for many study, research, news and other productive th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 642, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... a negative development in the society. Therefore maximum use of mobile phones can cause ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ing mobile phone excessively for a long period of time is a negative development.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93854748603 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62622127206 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0144448515 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168444998071 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556557945001 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482398350391 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112952651577 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300697878792 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.