The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the average amount of carbon dioxide emitted per person in 4 distinguished nations within a period of 40 years, starting in 1967.
In general, while the amount of CO2 emission in the United Kingdom and Sweden inclined to decrease, that in Italy and Portugal witnessed upward trends.
As can be observed, while the average emissions in the United Kingdom dropped slightly and then gradually reached the lowest point, it remained the country with the most gas pollutants, at around 9 metric tonnes. Furthermore, despite having experienced a significant rise by 1 metric tonnes, the figure for that in Sweden fell dramatically to the bottom-most point at the end of the period.
Regarding the remaining features, it is clear that Italy and Portugal underwent a relatively similar pattern in their fluctuations. To be more specific, the average CO2 emissions in Portugal and Italy was initially around 1 and 4. 5 metric tonnes, respectively, which both climbed up by more than 3 metric tonnes in 1997. In 2007, in comparison with the stability of Italy's carbon dioxide emission at under 8 metric tonnes, that in Portugal kept increasing minimally to approximately 5 metric tonnes.
- The following chart shows the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to Housing preferences of UK people 84
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves Some people think this is good for the world of sports while others think there are disadvantages of this Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26808510638 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87526722438 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570212765957 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0606260066 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467148046597 0.215688989381 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191538001171 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191381282261 0.0843802449381 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299878702365 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.288031231817 0.0819641961636 351% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.