the charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organisations in 2008 and 2014
This pie graph illustrates the proportion of individuals working for various volunteer organizations over the year 2008 and 2014.
Overall, it is obvious that voluntary work for education accounted for the highest percentage in 2008. On the contrary, the data shows that health care services seemed to be the least favorite in 2008.
Volunteer work related to environmental conservation and education accounted for approximately 24 % and 21% of voluntary work in 2008. On the other hand, the number of individuals who volunteered in sport and art organizations was nearly the same, at about 15% and 18%. Only 7 percent of the population participated in healthcare, which is the lowest.
In 2014, 29% and 25% people were reported to join in volunteering in environmental and sport related organizations, which made these two types of voluntary work the highest. The chart shows a contrast, however, with only 8% of individuals participating in health care centers. This clearly indicates that more people are interested in volunteering for environmental and sport related organizations than for health care centers. This is a concerning statistic, as health care centers provide vital services to the community and need volunteers to run effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | bobsubnot | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of energy produced from different resources in country in 1985 and 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant
- the maps show changes that took place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 78
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 67
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 61
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45128205128 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26490351472 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2566182133 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213627268202 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084028409792 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457576260759 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137818969561 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292632080119 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45128205128 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26490351472 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2566182133 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213627268202 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084028409792 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457576260759 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137818969561 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292632080119 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.