the charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied charts provide the information on how habits of people commuting to one university by 5 main means of transportation had changed over the course of 5 years, from 2004 to 2009.
As the data suggested, the majority of college students were initially accustomed to driving their private vehicles such as cars. Nevertheless, throughout the time span, they seemed to be gradually getting more keen on traveling by public transports, especially by buses.
Take a quick glance at the pie charts, it is noticeable that more than half of the people were driving to university by cars in 2004 while roughly 33% of the population tended to catch the bus at that time. However, the percentage of pupils who drove went down mostly two times to only 28% whereas the proportion of people taking the bus surged up to 46% in 5 years.
Following the figure, quite a jump was observed in the rate of human beings riding their bike to college, starting at 9% in 2004 and nearly doubling to 16% in 2009. Besides, data on people who chose to commute by train or on foot were reported to be minor; even so, they both experienced a slight rise from a mere 3% to 4% and from 4% to 6%, respectively.
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- People nowadays sleep less than they used to in the past What do you think is the reason behind this What are the effects on individuals and people around them 78
- the charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, even so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62441314554 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67532318431 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643192488263 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.8425373115 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.714285714 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144375300857 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062226391572 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798889296433 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949499534972 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928581903682 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.