New parents should take part in parenting courses to ensure the development of their child. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Parents who are newbies in childcaring, may find it sophisticated to nourish children. Whereas some people argue that it is essential for new parents to take parenting courses in order to ensure their offspring’s growth, I would suppose that there may be alternative ways for this issue.
There is no doubt that participating in parenthood courses may offer new parents reliable knowledge about child caring. In fact, parenting courses are likely to be operated by experts who are masters of nourishing children; hence, participants could observe significant skills or tricks to ensure nutrition for children or manage in emergency situations. For instance, parents may know how to give first aid when their child has a broken arm, and this can initially assist doctors in the treatment process.
However, several parents may have difficulties in accessing parenthood courses due to their busy schedules or living in rural areas. Therefore, they tend to learn the way to bring up children from their child’s grandparents, books or podcasts. However, books may be opted for dealing with their situations by new parents for some advantages. Firstly, parents who are busy for the whole day, could also observe child-caring knowledge because they can be flexible in their schedule. Secondly, books could be a reliable source for new parents to learn from because they are often written by experts in the child-caring field and quality checked by publishers.
In a nutshell, I believe that enrolling in parenting courses may not be the best way for newbies in child care because of some drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-29 | Kang Jimin | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | Kang Jimin | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
Parents who are newbies in childcaring, may find it sop...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...es are likely to be operated by experts who are masters of nourishing children; hence, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in fact, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23346303502 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85272659472 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548638132296 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5600208165 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.272727273 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273644665829 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128532038429 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458904089031 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194570710568 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389705337475 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.