The rapid growth of urban populations has resulted in a concerning shortage of outdoor spaces, which has a detrimental impact on energy levels and productivity. In my opinion, this is a highly unfavorable situation as it directly harms individuals' well-being and their ability to perform effectively.
Living in accommodations with limited space has far-reaching consequences for people's physical strength and overall health. A significant concern is the effect on respiratory health. In cramped living environments, proper ventilation is often lacking, leading to the accumulation of pollutants and an increased risk of allergies and respiratory illnesses. The absence of adequate fresh air circulation and natural sunlight exacerbates these problems, making it extremely challenging for residents to maintain optimal health and vitality.
Moreover, the scarcity of space within these accommodations gives rise to numerous inconveniences, ultimately resulting in a decline in productivity. When multiple generations coexist in tiny and narrow houses, privacy becomes a luxury that is seldom attained. Hosting celebrations or inviting guests becomes uncomfortable and burdensome due to the lack of space. Additionally, children face significant difficulties in finding a peaceful and conducive environment for studying, ultimately hindering their academic progress and potential. Furthermore, when a family member falls ill, the already cramped living conditions create additional challenges and hardships for everyone else in the household.
In conclusion, choosing to reside in a dwelling that lacks adequate outdoor space is an imprudent decision with severe consequences. Not only does it negatively impact individuals' physical and emotional well-being, but it also significantly diminishes their overall productivity and potential. It is crucial for policymakers and urban planners to prioritize the provision of sufficient outdoor areas and promote the development of housing solutions that prioritize the holistic needs of individuals, thereby fostering healthier and more productive communities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.18707482993 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41500833375 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7703339445 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.928571429 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140286633145 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391662272206 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456831044162 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735002944983 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526636766223 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.32 50.2224549098 32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.62 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.55 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.