The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The given line graph depicts how the statistics for the transportation of goods in the UK by four different types of transport changed, over a 28-year period, commencing from 1974.
Overall, with the exception of rail, which stayed the same, all categories experienced an upward trend over the period shown. Throughout the period of 28 years, the pipeline was constantly receiving the lowest figures, the opposite was true for road.
Road recorded the highest number at the beginning of the period with 70 million tonnes. Over the next 28 years, there was a gradual increase to nearly 100 million tonnes. Meanwhile, the pipeline witnessed the lowest number with five million tonnes. In 1982, the number of goods transported by pipeline rose significantly to approximately 30 million tonnes. During the 20-year period, commencing from 1982, the figures for pipeline fluctuated around ten million tonnes.
Turning to the statistics for water and rail, they came in second and third place in 1974, with 40 and approximately 40 million tonnes. Throughout the period of 28 years, figures for water showed a remarkable increase to roughly 70 million tonnes. Likewise, the transportation of rail did not change too much.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-30 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant 56
- The line graph below shows the average carbon dioxide C02 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...eriod, commencing from 1974. Overall, with the exception of rail, which stayed the same, all catego...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25128205128 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78860270789 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2626833765 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0909090909 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156339385845 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066600462407 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113113068574 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132665867167 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155618811046 0.0819641961636 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.