Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which
they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any
certainty.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Immediate application of investigations usually means it is tested and applied in daily applications as soon as possible with adequate accuracy and performance. Some would argue that investigations of researchers should be limited to only those areas which would have immediate practical applications. However many would likely to agree that investigations of researchers should be free with absolutely zero constraints. Although it may appear to some people that outcome of any investigation can easily be calculated and estimated however that is not always the case because the outcome of very investigation could also depends upon the sentiments of various parameters such as environment, global markets and diplomatic issues.
Investigations researchers should be free because free environments among the maverick researchers fosters the pioneering ideas in their brains. Limiting investigations to particular area especially in the areas where researchers explicitly have no interest can deterioration of investigations and final products. It could also cause unexpected delays which would utimately have it's affect on immediate application.
On the other hand it is also important to analyze whether the immediate application of investigations are viable or not. Time provided to investigations for researchers should be sufficient enough so that the investigations of researchers could brought into the use within the time constraint with great accuracy and precision.
In conclusion it is necessary that research should be as free as possible with minimum limits on the areas regardless of immediate and practical applications. This allows maverick researchers to perform on their optimum level and which not only deliver investigation on time but would also deliver it in high quality.
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supportin 50
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East Mer 53
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty Writ 50
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... have immediate practical applications. However many would likely to agree that investi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 622, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'depend'
Suggestion: depend
...utcome of very investigation could also depends upon the sentiments of various paramete...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lobal markets and diplomatic issues. Investigations researchers should be fre...
^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...d delays which would utimately have its affect on immediate application. On the othe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its affect on immediate application. On the other hand it is also important t...
^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...the investigations of researchers could brought into the use within the time constraint...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t with great accuracy and precision. In conclusion it is necessary that resea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 265.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81509433962 5.05705443957 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38254266398 2.79657885939 121% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524528301887 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5578778612 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.090909091 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35925922465 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153464120794 0.0831039109588 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676689055464 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241795180804 0.150359130593 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385505539989 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 48.8420337079 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.1639044944 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.