The given line graph illustrates how much money people spent on books in four different European countries, Germany, France, Italy and Austria respectively over a period of 10 year, starting from 1995.
Overall, it is obvious that all four countries see an upward trend over the period shown. Besides, the figure for Germany was highest.
To begin with Germany, the amount of money spent on books rose slightly from 80 to 90 million dollars from 1995 to 1999. Moreover, there was a slow decrease in the expenditure for books in this countries beetween 1999 and 2003. However, this figure go up constantly in the phase of 2003 to 2005 and peaked at 95 millon dollars in 2005. In France, the year 1995 witnessed a continuos growth from 55 to 75 milion dollars in the amount of money spent on books to 2005.
In terms of Italy, a slight growth of 5 million dollars was witnessed in the amount of money spent on books beetween 1995 and 1997, after which the year 1999 saw a slow decline of 10 million dollars in this figure. In contrast, during a 6-year period, starting from 1999, this figure for the mentioned countries grow continuosly by 15 million dollars and reached a peak of about 60 million dollars in 2005. Additionally, a constant increase from 30 to 40 milion dollars was seen in the amount of money spent on books in Austria from 1995 to 1999, and this was followed by the stable stay in this figure in the year 2001. On the other hand, there was a dramatic growth of 30 million dollars in the amount of money spent on books in 2005.
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 67
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
- Some people say that online learning is the most effective and convenient way to learn Others say that online learning will be never be as effective as learning at a real school in person Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Some employers are giving increased importance to employing people with good social skills in addition to good qualifications Do you agree or disagree that social skills are as important as good qualifications for success in a job 78
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ecrease in the expenditure for books in this countries beetween 1999 and 2003. Howev...
^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'continuos'' or 'continuo's'?
Suggestion: continuos'; continuo's
...5. In France, the year 1995 witnessed a continuos growth from 55 to 75 milion dollars in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e of 10 million dollars in this figure. In contrast, during a 6-year period, start...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56272401434 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37190966804 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455197132616 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2083522582 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.727272727 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275001149589 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127192010851 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871267259624 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172351247274 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824601217291 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.