A highly controversial issue today relates to the opinion that money should be spent on international funds by the government while those netizens still face poor conditions in life. I partially agree with the view and my reasons will be explained in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why some people might believe that raising money for foreign aid is not necessary. On our planet, not all countries have a large budget to contribute international funds, which is the reason why those netizens should be preferred by the government. Moreover, instead of spending money on those funds, the government might use the money to promote the economy of their country and their netizens will have a stable living standard. For instance, the government could open more companies for the unemployed and homeless to have an income and they should create more scholarships for poor children to motivate them to continue their step on education. It is clear that only after its citizens have a better living standard and proper schooling will a country become developed.
On the other hand, some argue that donating money to low-economic countries is a huge step in relationships and creates a strong bond between nations. To be more specific, developed countries will decrease tax barriers which help domestic companies have a chance to penetrate new markets overseas. Besides that, when a country is facing difficulties, other countries are always ready for help from those. For example, during the covid-19 pandemic, the USA provided a huge vaccine Moderna and Pfizer for Viet Nam while Viet Nam was trying to fight the pandemic in a disabled way. In addition, A brother country of Viet Nam - is Cambodia where Viet Nam constructed a national building as a present to express international relations between the two countries.
In conclusion, I believe that countries should donate money for foreign assistance to connect other nations together to have a peaceful earth.
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 73
- The line graph illustrates the amount of fruit production in 4 countries such as France Spain Germany Turkey between 1970 and 2010 67
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 82
- The table The table shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A highly controversial issue today relat...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...explained in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, there are several reaso...
^^^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e preferred by the government. Moreover, instead of spending money on those funds...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oling will a country become developed. On the other hand, some argue that donat...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... relations between the two countries. In conclusion, I believe that countries ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80246077003 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563076923077 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.4632183486 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201113236035 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705800295831 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056384647305 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120241869236 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732463639744 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.