rate of each gender in 4 different countries in 2002
The representation below depicts the employment rate of each gender in 4 different countries in 2002 namely South Africa, Chile, Finland, Norway.
It is clear that the estimate of male was dominated in all 4 countries,which occupied the most in Norway at nearly 80%. Additionally, the percentage of female was the lowest in Chile at over 30%.
To begin with South Africa having 50% male so that the rate of male was more than female by around 10%. In Chile there was a huge difference, the rate of male was at 70% which is casually doubled the figure for female rating. Furthermore the percentage of male in Chile was higher than the figure for South Africa, followed by the slightly higher female rate in Chile. Moreover, the standard of male in Finland was nearly 70%, compared to the lower rate for females at around 65%. Similarly the percentage of female and male in Norway was higher than Finland, which had the same gap as the figure in Finland.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-28 | Jaden_ | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-30 | Trangg Changg | 72 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | phạm khánh linh | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | ncthanhloan | 78 | view |
- Many Students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 72
- The diagram below shows the process of plastic bottle production 73
- the payment by British parents on their children s favorite sport from 2008 to 2014 73
- The diagram shows the production of bottled and canned carbonated water 78
- Many today feel that attention spans are becoming shorter due to the prevalence of social media To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...of male was dominated in all 4 countries,which occupied the most in Norway at nearly 8...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...y doubled the figure for female rating. Furthermore the percentage of male in Chile was hig...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 482, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...e lower rate for females at around 65%. Similarly the percentage of female and male in No...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, similarly, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73214285714 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58850562962 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511904761905 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.9728246786 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.375 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15412588394 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862613821273 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151759338582 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180598347673 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.214962782586 0.0819641961636 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.