The given maps depict modifications made to the layout of an unspecified town after a construction of a hydroelectric power dam in two separate years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, there had been an extensive renovation with the most striking feature involves the demolition of some areas on the left side of the picture and the introduction of a new hotel.
As can be clearly seen from the map, in the Western part, overhead power line was installed, taking up the space where there had been rare plants and animals, the forest and the ancient structure at the end of the period. Another significant changes involves the erection of a hydroelectric as well as the relocation of villages to the East of the town to make room for a big hotel.
However, the remaining parts of the zone including the river and mountains which sited in close proximity to it remained unchanged throughout the given period.
- The maps below show the layouts of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 60
- The maps below show the layouts of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013
- The maps below show the changes in a town in Europe after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam Describe the noticeable changes in the maps 61
- The maps below show the changes in a town in Europe after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam Describe the noticeable changes in the maps 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'involve'.
Suggestion: involve
...the period. Another significant changes involves the erection of a hydroelectric as well...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
... the river and mountains which sited in close proximity to it remained unchanged throughout the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 755.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87096774194 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81200044702 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638709677419 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.5745625622 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 151.0 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203563449325 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957013097635 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102000741221 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105802917097 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114614617206 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.