The maps below show the changes in a town in Europe after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam. Describe the noticeable changes in the maps
The pictures indicate the transformation of a European town from 1990 to 2010.
Looking at the maps, we can see that the town underwent extensive changes from a rural area into a more modernized town with the construction of a system of electric poles and a hydroelectric dam.
As can be observed, the river at the town center in 1990 was diminished in length to make way for the lake on the town's northern side. The river extended to the south, and the hydroelectric dam was erected at the end of the river. Along the river banks, the place of mountain areas 10 years ago, settled the electric poles.
The electric system’s existence turned the town into a modernized area compared to 1990. However, there was no room for rare plants and animals, and irrigated farmlands near the river in 1990 were also removed to make room for the lake. With the demolishing of the forest and ancient structures, the land on the northwest was left empty in 2010. The residents' accommodations were replaced with a hotel, while the villages were then relocated near the river and the electric pole system.
- School should focus more on teaching students how to be successful in the workforce and less on helping them achieve academic success To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The two maps below show the changes in town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton 78
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is it the case Is it a positive development 84
- Topic More and more people are migrating to cities in search of better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77486910995 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68600164981 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549738219895 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4620297721 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104748326805 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447750134261 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590118090374 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789529675274 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692412532625 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.