The two maps below show the changes in town of Denham from 1986 to the present day. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The diagrams indicate the transformation of the town of Denham in the period from 1986 onward.
It is clear that the town has undergone remarkable changes with the modernized infrastructure and the conversion into a more residential area over the period surveyed.
As can be seen in the pictures, two farmland areas were located in the north-east and south-west of the town in 1986, but then these areas have been removed to make way for housing, which has turned the town into a more residential area. The infrastructure has also been renovated with side roads being constructed leading to housing instead of the only main road in the past. The bridge over the river Stoke has remained unchanged since 1986.
Another notable change is seen for large house to the east of the river, which has been expanded and converted into a retirement home. Additionally, the primary school situates in the same location as it did, but has experienced an enlargement with two new blocks of building. Two shops lied across the school has also been demolished for additional housing while the post office still remains its position.
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses Why Who benefits more from this the community or these young people 82
- The table shows the changes in modes of travel in a European country between 1995 and 2005 It also shows a projection to the year 2015 58
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Topic Some people claim that tourism can help to bridge cultural gaps between people of different nationalities and cultures Do you agree or disagree 94
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97340425532 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74840482151 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61170212766 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2359436764 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134326369974 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601944687968 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048839206959 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949054794741 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507042231294 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.