The graph provides information about the contribution of three primary sectors to the UK economy. Write a report summarizing the differences
Given is the chart comparing the proportion that three sectors contributed to the UK economy over the 1900-2000 period.
Overall, there was a significant difference in each sector’s contribution value throughout the century, especially in Agriculture and Business and Financial. While Agriculture and Manufacturing showed a downward trend, Business and Financial followed the opposite pattern.
In the 1900-1950 period, agriculture activities played the most important role in the British economy. Its contribution value reached a peak of 50 percent in 1950, while another primary sector, Manufacturing, saw a slight decrease in proportion, from 45 to 40 percent. On the contrary, the business industry was shown to be an unimportant sector, contributing a negligible proportion of 10 percent despite a rapid rise in 1950.
The second half of the century witnessed a massive change in the role of each sector in the national economy when Agriculture’s contribution slumped by 40 percent in 1975 and ended with below 5 percent at the end, losing its importance to the economy. By contrast, the contribution of Business and Financial continued surging to nearly 45 percent in the end, over twofold its figure in 1975. This steep rise also made Business and Financial the key sector of the economy eventually. Manufacturing saw a steady drop over the period and maintained its position as the second important sector with the figure over tenfold Agriculture in 2000.
- Some people believe charity organizations should only offer help to people of their own country Others claim that these organizations should give aid to people in great need wherever they live Discuss both views and give your opinions 78
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 73
- Anyone found guilty of committing a crime should be sent to prison Do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses Why Who benefits more from this the community or these young people 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43043478261 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14268436665 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552173913043 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6972539183 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.9 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166763142102 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074535325333 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642665967491 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124167789405 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061092368871 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.