The line chart delineates how many international tourists visiting to different destinations in a particular European nation during the period of 2 decades, starting from 1987.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is obvious that the number of tourists visiting had a tendency to increase, meanwhile, the figure for the coastal region was higher than the two remaining places.
As is presented in the line chart, the quantity of international tourists who visited the coast ranked first in the year 1987, stood at 40.000, was fourfold and doubled in comparison to the data for the Lakes and the mountains respectively. While the number of those enjoying the mountain destinations was slightly increased fluctuation, the record for the Lakes witnessed a sharp growth and gain the first rank, peaking at 75.000 individuals. In contrast, the number of international residents who enjoyed the coastal areas dropped minimally by 5.000, however, it started to rise dramatically just beneath 65.000 in the year 2002.
By the year 2007, the number of people who come to European for enjoying maritime voyages ranked first again, reaching 75.000 travelers. However, the data for the mountainous landscape still ranked last, and it was halved to compare with coastal areas. Lastly, after a period of 15-year continual rise, tourists who have a tour of the Lake dropped significantly, particularly a third reduction compared to 2002.
- The maps below shows the development of a particular area from 1965 to present day 78
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar
- Table The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, look, so, still, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33628318584 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92648859558 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579646017699 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4265948224 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.75 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0910815565528 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440890752103 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388803566861 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608346248671 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264617636586 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, look, so, still, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33628318584 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92648859558 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579646017699 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4265948224 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.75 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0910815565528 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440890752103 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388803566861 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608346248671 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264617636586 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.