A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Education is the birthright of all huam beings, irrespective of their gender, race, and culutre. Educators are merely faciliatators which impart knowledge. Some might argue that having a homogenous curriculum within a nation would be disadvantageous, while I disagree with them. The validation of my stances would be put forth in the following essay:
In a country like India, where there are many languages, cultures, religions, all these affects the upbringing of a child. Some states are more advance compare to other. People living in these state adjust with the new trends much faster compare than the residents of other states. So, the states with faster adjustment to the new trends, introduce newer concepts in their curriculum to stay apar with the world, compare to the other states which follows older currriculum and do not bring more changes when needed. This would affect the students, and the students who study in the more progressive state would have upper hand in getting a better career opportunities compare to their peers. But if a nation has same curriculum then this would not be a case and all the students across the nation would have equal chance.
Studying a same national curriculum would also generate a sense of unity among the students. They would learn the same thing about the culture, traditions, and history of a country. This would help to increase a sense of brotherhood among the citizens. For instance, in Japan where same national curriculum is followed people value their culture and traditions very much and the Japanese from the very young age are taught about unity and brotherhood. There are many instances where Japan unity has played a major role like, even after a major natural calamity it only takes few days for the Japanes to start their daily life that was before the calamity. In times of need Japanese people help each other and this is due to the traditionals and culture which they are taught from very young age.
However, some might argue that having a same national curriculum till a student reaches college would restrict the growth of creativity among the students. We could avoid this by providing electives option in the curriculum so at the end it would be the students' choice which career path they want to persue. This would be beneficial as in today's fast-pacred world, where talent is highly valued, one should persue a carrer in which they have mastery. This would avoid stress and becoming bore with ones career.
In conclusion, I would like to highlight that having a same national curriculum would have more advantages. Each student would get equal chance and all of them would have gain same knowledge. There would be unite among the residents of the country and a sense of brotherhood.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-18 ekarumeblessing@icloud.com 66 view
2024-11-09 KLH 66 view
2024-09-28 ascetichedonist 83 view
2024-08-30 Rishab@1999 66 view
2024-08-27 Rishab@1999 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user shubham1102 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...am beings, irrespective of their gender, race, and culutre. Educators are merely ...
^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... This would help to increase a sense of brotherhood among the citizens. For inst...
^^
Line 4, column 500, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...uld avoid stress and becoming bore with ones career. In conclusion, I would like to...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96336206897 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55349189554 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491379310345 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3018937031 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.681818182 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219429138784 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748125491839 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832159338219 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13260149619 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277932000848 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.