It is a common belief that allocating time for studying online is wasted. However, from my perspective, I firmly oppose this stance due to the incredible effectiveness and efficiency that the Internet contributes to study progress.
To begin with, the learning quality of students can be raised significantly via utilizing the Internet. The fundamental reason is that the Internet entitles learners to a wide range of academic materials. With the access to copious amounts of documents compiled by prestigious professors, students will have to collate and reaffirm them in order to sum up accurate information. This in turn may enhance their research skills appreciably. What is more, the Internet enables students to discuss together through social platforms as well. In other words, learners stand a good chance to express their own ideas and receive constructive advice from others. As a result, children are able to complete their works more as well as develop discussion skills. Hence, it is undeniable that the studying on the Internet can ensure and even improve the effectiveness of children.
Another merit of online learning is its superior efficiency compared to other kinds of studying. Unlike studying at schools, studying on the Internet allows children to take a more active part in finding answers to their questions without depending much on teachers. With the advances in search engines and artificial assistants such as Bing, students are able to get their questions responded nearly immediately. Therefore, they can spend more time for other assignments instead of struggling with any specific questions. Futhermore, via the Internet, children can find new exercises and finish them at their own discretion. By browsing academic websites, students are able to access their works at the same time. Thus, it is plausible that the learning productivity of children is enhanced a lot by studying online.
In conclusion, I solemnly affirm that studying on the Internet is worth the time and efforts spent owing to their wonderful assistance to learners' effectiveness and efficiency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... To begin with, the learning quality of students can be raised significantly ...
^^
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...n are able to complete their works more as well as develop discussion skills. Henc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40425531915 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9465855157 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3170330515 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7777777778 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188309499813 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618003772561 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569955738187 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13038880923 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408493693794 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.