The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The pie charts illustrate energy production by 5 different sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Overall, Australia generated slightly more energy than its counterpart initially but was exceeded in the last year. Coal was Australia’s main fuel source in both years while that of France shifted from oil and natural gas to nuclear power.
100 units of fuel were produced in Australia in 1980, 50 of which came from coal. Natural gas and hydro power, each contributing 20 units to the total, were double the amount of oil generated. After 2 decades, the country recorded an upsurge in coal production of 80 units, indicating a nearly three-fold growth. Likewise, 36 units of hydro power were generated in 2000, almost doubling that in 1980. A reverse pattern was observed in the figures for oil and natural gas as both reduced to a mere 2 units.
With regard to France, fuel outputs of coal, oil and natural gas were relatively comparable, ranging from 20 to 25 units. The remaining 20 of 90 total units were produced using hydro and nuclear power. By 2000. France’s fuel generation had doubled to 180 units, with nuclear power climbing to 126 units to become the most common source. The figure for oul also experienced an upward pattern, increasing slightly from 20 to 25, while that of coal remained unchanged at 25 units. In contrast, natural gas and hydro power dramatically fell to insignificant quantities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
- the graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people claim that employers should not be concerned about the way employees dress but only about the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 78
- Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just a waste of money To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('nearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('three-fold') instead of another adjective.
...coal production of 80 units, indicating a nearly three-fold growth. Likewise, 36 units of hydro pow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, so, while, as to, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94605809129 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67706574713 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560165975104 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3464023259 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6923076923 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239192321146 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107978262807 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130318901486 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219524675081 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167876557322 0.0819641961636 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('nearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('three-fold') instead of another adjective.
...coal production of 80 units, indicating a nearly three-fold growth. Likewise, 36 units of hydro pow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, so, while, as to, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94605809129 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67706574713 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560165975104 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3464023259 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6923076923 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239192321146 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107978262807 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130318901486 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219524675081 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167876557322 0.0819641961636 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.