Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A number of protests have been raised against zoos, stating that they are inhumane and should be abolished, while other people think they are a viable means of preserving wildlife. These schools of thought will be discussed in the following essay, along with reasons why I am of the second opinion.
On the one hand, there are convincing arguments for supporters of banning zoos. To begin with, they may deprive animal species of their natural habitat. In order to maximize profits, some zoo owners opt to keep animals in squalid conditions. They are poorly treated and often have to live in packed and enclosed cages. In these environments, species’ well-being might suffer greatly from diseases. Furthermore, synthetic settings can lead to the loss of natural instinct. For example, tigers, when they are brought to zoos, would give up hunting as food is readily available. Over generations, they would drop unique practices of the species and become unable to return to the wild.
However, I stand with advocates for the operation of zoos. To individuals, a visit to zoological gardens could be a valuable lesson on biodiversity. For instance, visitors entering African safaris will be shown the wide range of wild animals within the sites and the characteristics of each species. Therefore, zoos can help raise the public's awareness about the state of wildlife in the contemporary world and encourage people to participate in protecting it. Apart from the educational value, they can also introduce economical boosts to an area. Within each region, there are exotic species of animals which can be appealing to foreign tourists. To illustrate, while Serbia has snow tigers, pandas are native in China. The appeal helps increase visitorship to conservation sites, thereby providing additional revenues which, in turn, can be used to improve facilities to better accommodate different animals.
In conclusion, I wholly believe that zoos can contribute to improving the education and economy of a country, despite concerns for their unethical nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | amellia1607 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | thuthao2000 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | stewies | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | xuanmailonton | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-04 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 78
- Some people claim that employers should not be concerned about the way employees dress but only about the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- the graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
- ok
- Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just a waste of money To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...ies. Therefore, zoos can help raise the publics awareness about the state of wildlife i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31498470948 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81584461797 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648318042813 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8431036814 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4736842105 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2105263158 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262236685607 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625022615907 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048129667628 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143795292574 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406038817841 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.