The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This graph presents the average carbon dioxide emission per individual in four European countries, namely the United Kingdom, Italy, Sweden and Portugal, over a span of four decades, from 1967 to 2007. Since the beginning, Italy and Portugal’s carbon discharge were increasing slightly while Sweden and United Kingdom’s plunged dramatically.
According to the chart provided, it is evident that the United Kingdom’s emissions reached a plateau of 11 metric tonnes in 1967 until 1977. Subsequently, it experienced a modest decrease to below 10mt in 2007. Conversely, Sweden saw fluctuations in its CO2 release. Peaking at 10mt in 1977, before dropping significantly to around 7mt in 1987 and finally stabilizing just over 4mt in 2007, showcasing an overall reduction.
On the other hand, the two remaining countries experienced an upward trend. Italy, starting at approximately 4 mt in 1967, reaching to almost 8mt in 2007. Portugal began emissions with below 2mt in 1967 and observed a steady increase to around 6mt in 2007.
In conclusion, it is clear that the United Kingdom produced the largest amounts of gas throughout this period, as opposed to Portugal, where a person emitted on average the least amounts of CO2.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-18 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-18 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | nguyenanh9182 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | yousefikia | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | Trunggg | view |
- The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries and the pie chart shows the percentage of books by type that were borrowed over this time Summarise the information by selecting and r 89
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, if, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94308938837 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651282051282 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.3014910316 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.3 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309952920237 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102993336036 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749204949328 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168038373912 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816319321017 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, if, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94308938837 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651282051282 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.3014910316 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.3 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309952920237 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102993336036 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749204949328 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168038373912 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816319321017 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.