The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts the number of average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in four countries from 1967 to 2007.
The initial impression is that throughout this period Italy and Portugal have upward trend totally and Sweden and United Kingdom have downward trend. By 1967 the lowest metric tonnes of CO2 emissions related to Portugal.
As can be seen, there was an increased in Portugal to around 4.5 metric tonnes until 1997 and then has a plateau trend till 2007. Italy has risen about 2 metric tonnes from 1967 to 1977 and rise gradually 20 years under 8 metric tonnes and to 2007 did not change any more. Although Sweden totally decreased approximately to 5.8 tonnes first sugar 2 tonnes in 1997 and then dropped suddenly from 11 to 5.8 in 2007. Among all countries the United Kingdom did not a significant change and crashed slightly during these years to nearly 9 tonnes.
In conclusion, Although the United Kingdom has downward trend the average of CO2 emission in this country was more than others and Portugal located in the last place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-18 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-18 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | nguyenanh9182 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | yousefikia | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | Trunggg | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by seleting and reroting the main features and make comprasions where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...s period Italy and Portugal have upward trend totally and Sweden and United Kingdom h...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...Sweden and United Kingdom have downward trend. By 1967 the lowest metric tonnes of CO...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 57, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...lthough the United Kingdom has downward trend the average of CO2 emission in this cou...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81318681319 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32190807194 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4338797758 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24324745963 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113813860501 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850425890882 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180863118552 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835113434521 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.