While there are certain drawbacks of communication through social media instead of talking face to face, I believe that the its benefits outweigh these drawbacks.
It is undeniable that chatting online can not take the place of talking face to face completely. Although methods of chatting online have become abundant in forms including voice messages and video calls, it is still unable to meet people’s demands for communication perfectly. For example, we can not hug our friends in video calls when they are in need. Another defect is that sending a message is so easy that the text seemingly lacks sincere feelings. The one chatting with you online may contact several people at the same time, which leads to less attention on each one. After all, it is uncomfortable to be treated without enough attention and care.
But social media really brings convenience and joy to our social life. With the aid of video calls, we are able to see friends and family who live away from us. Functions of social media such as moments offer opportunities for us to know about what happens in each other’s life in time. And new pleasure has been created by application of social media. For example, young people prefer to use emoji and stickers to express their feelings interestingly. And memes are popular with people who are not good at talking. The new use of text and pictures contributes to delight of online interaction.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it is advantageous in a variety of ways to communicate on social media.
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group 67
- The users of social media such as Facebook Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The most important function of music is that helps people reduce stress or relaxing To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...of talking face to face, I believe that the its benefits outweigh these drawbacks. I...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al life. With the aid of video calls, we are able to see friends and family who l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, really, so, still, while, after all, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90038314176 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68803916042 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616858237548 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.530483643 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2666666667 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17101224007 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547662053599 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670872286665 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128111282422 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545174676111 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.