It is widely held that information about people who do illegal activities should be kept private. However, there is a more persuasive argument that one’s details must be widely shared to protect the community.
On the one hand, some people say that making personal information about individuals involved in criminal activities public can lead to innocent people being victimized. They believe the society may look down on the offender’s family members based on their association. For example, a boy who decided to commit suicide when his father’s illegal record was released. Because he not only received teasing and bullying from his friends at school but also was ridiculed by his neighbors. The treatment of the boy exceeded his threshold for tolerance and was unjust.
Nevertheless, distributing facts about offenders who have been convicted of violent crimes can prevent members of the community from danger. Because when people perceive that crime is rampant and perpetrators often escape accountability, they may lose faith in the effectiveness of these institutions. So, this effort aims to deter repeat offenses. Moreover, when criminal records are known, neighbors are willing to keep an eye on crime’s activity and report anything unlawful or suspicious to the police. A registered sex offender from Korea, for instance, is given his freedom back. However, he has required to wear an electronic monitoring device on his whereabouts and has supervised by the government.
In conclusion, while it is apparent that the private data of crime are not to be given out, it is undeniable that this information should be broadcast to become wary, taking security precautions.
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 67
- Some people believe that the personal information of violent criminals should be made available to the public Others think that this information should be protected 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40377358491 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95140661326 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649056603774 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6487769068 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249444975811 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728233252758 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100659000593 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166231748047 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826044277108 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.