The line graph show internet users as percentage of population.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the proportion of people who used the Internet in the USA, Canada and Mexico from 1999 to 2009. It is clear that the percentage of Internet users increased in each country over the period shown. Overall, the rate of Canada experienced the fastest growth in Internet usage.
In particular, from 1999 to 2001,there was an upward trend. Mexico had the lowest proportion of Internet users in 1999. At this time, the number of people using the Internet accounted for 5% of the total population in this country.It was only half of the proportion Canada used.
It is an obvious fact that there was a significant increase in Internet users in Mexico and Canada between 2001 and 2005 while the figures for the USA showed some fluctuations. Besides, Canada and USA reached the same level in 2005.
It is an undeniable fact that the number of Canadian Internet users grew up considerably to reach a peak in 2009. While about 80% of population in the USA used the Internet, about 40% of Mexicans were using it in 2009. The figures in the three countries are predicted to rise slightly in the following years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2009. It is clear that the percentage of Internet users increased in each country...
^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...of the total population in this country.It was only half of the proportion Canada ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79591836735 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56032995192 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515306122449 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8011325205 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4545454545 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15252200572 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609763157736 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442489161506 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097429376156 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367031972227 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.