The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph given compares how the households in a particular country spent their income per week in the period of 50 years.
Generally, it is obvious that in 1968, the percentage of income spent on food had the highest figure while the proportion of earnings dispensed to leisure had the peak number in 2018.
In detail, it can easily be observed that the figure of some fields, namely food,housing and leisure, had remarkable disparities. The percentage of revenues allocated for leisure and housing shot up in the period from 1968 to 2018, about 16% and 8% respectively. The figure for that of food is more negatively correlated, it went into a nosedive, about 17% decrease. When it comes to the remaining categories, the figures of them are more equally represented, the discrepancy among them is not outstanding except for the proportion of income spent on clothing and footwear, it remains unchanged through that period.
To sum up l, the average spending per week on the fundamental things in family units in specific country overwhelmed other fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 89
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 73
- Nowadays an increasing number of people with health problems are using alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their normal doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 81, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , housing
...t the figure of some fields, namely food,housing and leisure, had remarkable disparities...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 336, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ore negatively correlated, it went into a nosedive, about 17% decrease. When it comes to t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, except for, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07954545455 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86433523218 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0585253249 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.714285714 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155800957726 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717273068237 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536606497365 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104623849303 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437935349912 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.