Some people are concerned that numerous minority languages is under threat of dying out as increasing numbers of people speak languages such as English, Spanish and Mandarin. In response to this, action has been taken to protect minority languages in some countries. I believe it is necessary to do so and more attention should be paid to maintaining the balance between minority languages protection and communication across different areas.
There is no doubt that increasing use of lingua franca brings conveniences and improves efficiency in globalisation. Trades can be operated without obstacles across countries using common languages, leading to economic progress in these areas. Also, scientists from different regions get more opportunities to communicate and work collaboratively in order to study significant projects that are beneficial to whole human beings. However, the widely use of these languages may result in a reduction in the number of minority languages users.
Because language is one aspect of cultures more than a tool for communication, minority languages are still valuable and deserve protection. Some countries make main languages such as English as main subjects in schools but neglect the learning of native languages. As a result, there is a loss of cultural confidence and identification among local students with a lack of knowledge in their native language. Some steps have been taken to solve this issue.
In conclusion, common languages play a significant role in globalisation; however, native minority languages is indispensable in cultural identification. It deserves more attention to balance between protecting minority languages and communication in common languages.
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- The graph below show the value of clothing exported from Bangladesh between 1998 and 2012 and the pie chart shows the destinations and value of exported clothing in 2012 59
- The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetarian diet Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the man features
- The graph compares the percentage of theinternational and the percentage of UK student gaining second class degrees or better at a major UK university 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68482490272 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20637678613 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587548638132 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0781531691 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.384615385 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455667787749 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165129103199 0.084324248473 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11683733006 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281331080219 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10462118051 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.