Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or Dvds. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there has been some people who are against public libraries spending their limited purses on high-cost technological media such as software, videos or DVDs.They believe that public libraries should use these limited resources to supply books rather than some luxuries. This essay will argue why providing books is more important despite some objections.
Some people think that high-tech media is important in public libraries as technology has invaded our world. Everything has been operated with technology. They say that public libraries should also use technological media. This will keep libraries up-to-date. It will also facilitate for librarians to keep track of books and whether if they were borrowed.
Persons who prefer to listen to audiobooks will be encouraged to go to libraries as they will have the required technological equipment for that sort of things.
On the other hand, people who reject the previous opinion believe that the first and last mission for libraries is to bring and provide books. Public libraries should try to provide more books that are rarely to be found. The believe that libraries don't need all these luxuries especially that they have limited resources. Having limited purses force libraries to try to do their best to achieve their missions rather than luxuries that will affect on their main task. Moreover, they suppose that technological media will ruin the simple look of public libraries which makes them attractive.
This essay argued that people who are with providing libraries with high-tech media have a flawed understanding of the resources that affects the budget of libraries. In my opinion, public libraries should focus on providing books despite the development that it may gain if they used technology.
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 56
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
... media such as software, videos or DVDs.They believe that public libraries should us...
^^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...more books that are rarely to be found. The believe that libraries dont need all these luxu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
... books that are rarely to be found. The believe that libraries dont need all these luxu...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to be found. The believe that libraries dont need all these luxuries especially that...
^^^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...missions rather than luxuries that will affect on their main task. Moreover, they suppose...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, sort of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35357142857 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65075797785 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503571428571 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3962445539 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335556058701 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119767939952 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883195771427 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199598679951 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988008199504 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.