An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Why is this the case, and what solutions are possible?
With the rapid increase in the world’s population, the demand for consumer merchandise has surged conspicuously. To meet the requirements, many manufacturers produce a mass of goods with the ignorance of the consequences it may have on the environment. This essay will discuss the reasons and solutions which should be implemented to solve this issue.
The increase in the production of consumer commodities harms nature in several ways. Firstly, as more products are manufactured, more waste is generated. Such waste contains detrimental chemicals and is disposed of into the water supply plus the careless waste treatment system; as a consequence, the water and environment are polluted. Secondly, to meet the demand of purchasers, some factories use non-biodegradable materials such as glass, or plastic, which cannot decompose. To exemplify, these incorruptible accumulate in the environment and pollute the soil and water. If such wastes are burned, they will pollute the air.
Despite the indisputable aforementioned problems, there are many effective solutions to the issue of damaging the environment. Firstly, one way to tackle this problem is that companies should use more eco-friendly materials. For example, many coffee shops in Vietnam have replaced plastic straws with recyclable alternatives made of materials like paper or bamboo, which can influence the habit of using plastic straws for consumers. Secondly, the government can enforce sterner laws for factories disposing of contaminated waste into the river or any actions that damage the environment. Instead of warning, the council should heavily fine such factories to set a good example for other factories to be more careful with their waste disposal network. This method can help the government to win the trust and praise of domestic consumers through definitiveness and promptness in resolving the issue.
In conclusion, there are two main reasons why the environment is impacted by the growth of consumer products which are waste disposal and the usage of environmentally unfriendly materials. To address this problem, the city council and companies should join hands to make the products more eco-friendly by switching to greener materials and imposing more strict fines for individuals or companies that damage nature.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58974358974 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13462307193 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6834283851 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.411764706 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186807120648 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630107565209 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570719284856 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120325626496 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028208281501 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.