Whilst some individuals believe that animal testing is a vital commodity for medical purposes, others think this action has an adverse (cruel) effect on animals’ short life. In my viewpoint, animal experimentation is of paramount importance in human life.
Animal testing greatly facilitates medical development, which is necessary for both human and animal habitation. Animals in biomedical research develop new treatments for diseases as quickly, compared to that since time immemorial. Several instances of animal testing in vaccine development, experimental surgery, and cancer research ameliorate the effects of many illnesses. This can be seen in experiments of mice in mRNA COVID-19 vaccine development. Furthermore, not only do humans benefit from research and testing, a profusion of drugs and treatments developed can be now used in veterinary clinics as well, helping animals live longer, healthier lives. As a result, animal research plays a pivotal role in expanding life expectancy.
Detractors of animal experimentation for medical development assert that the harmful use of animal testing is not only cruel but also ineffective. This seems to stem from the fact that treatments, which can be used in animals rarely work in humans. Moreover, there are no accurate figures to determine precisely how many animals are used in the laboratory due to the lack of scrutiny. Therefore, animal experimentation inflicts on wasting animals’ lives with a surfeit of pain and fear.
In conclusion, both viewpoints maintain different justifications. Such exploitation of animals, though unkind, is essential for medical advances, including new inventions of treatment, which are fundamental to humanity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent, which are fundamental to humanity.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74117647059 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18507669793 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61568627451 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0405989625 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243178041651 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875529110081 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445299926522 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139373712131 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709884857713 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.