The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years.
Given is the bar chart illustrating data on the changes in the ratio of manufacturing five types of energy namely Coal, Gas, Petrol, Nuclear, and Other in France over a two-decade period, between 1995 and 2005, measured in percentages.
Overall, Coal and Gas took the dominant proportion, and Petrol experienced a significant fall throughout the given years.
In 1995, 29.80% of energy in France was produced by using coal, which accounted for the highest figure, followed by gas with a digit of 29.63%. Petrol accounted for about one-third of the energy manufactured in France. Nuclear and Other had clearly lower amounts of energy in comparison to these three mentioned, with 6.40% and nearly 5% respectively.
Coal and gas remained stable in their dominance of energy produced in 2005, with a figure of about one-third of each. Petrol witnessed a sharp decline to approximately 20% in the later year. Nuclear and Other doubled the amount of the production energy compared to 1995, which contribution came from the drop of petrol in producing energy.
- The table below shows the prices of cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014 84
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 73
- The graph below gives information from the 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA with projections from 1980 until 2030 73
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'lowed', 'lowered'.
Suggestion: lowed; lowered
...n France. Nuclear and Other had clearly lower amounts of energy in comparison to thes...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, third, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1976744186 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82031282187 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.790558691 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148210856528 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624357220127 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345587458187 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829471336003 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492046216942 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.