The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020.
Given is the bar chart illustrating data on the changes in the proportion of Iceland population which was divided into five distinctive categories, over a three-decade period, from 1990 to 2020, measured in percentages.
It is clear that the 25 - 54 age group took the dominant lead throughout the years, which highlights the fact that the workforce in Iceland is growing significantly.
In 1990, the 25 - 54 group took about 32% of the whole number of people in Iceland. The younger group, 0 - 14 and 15 - 24, occupied higher rates than the elderly, with over 20% of each compared to the over 10% in the two older groups. The population trend remained stable in the next ten years, 2000, which also witnessed a more specific rate in younger age groups. However, the over 65 and over group rose a little larger than the 55 - 64 group, contradicting to the 1990 figure.
The 25 - 54 age group reached its peak at nearly half of the population of Iceland in 2020, whereas the 15 - 24 age group showed a dramatic fall in the two next decades with its trough at about 8% in 2020. The 0 - 14 group also declined a little, and the two elderly groups still remained stable trend as in the previous period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | or | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | Hoang Thi Phung | view | |
| 2023-07-10 | Hoang Thi Phung | view | |
| 2022-11-28 | jena_03 | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 73
- Every year several languages die out Some people think this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages 56
- The table below shows the prices of cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61682242991 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61206890894 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556074766355 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2463871323 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2040023269 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929982216573 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752888655053 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12847872004 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314794057307 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.