According to the reading passage, it is stated that nowadays, fishers build some artificial reefs from old metal objects and industrial materials to provide shelter for fish and thus help to increase fish population. The article expresses some benefits of this action. However, the lecturer rebutes the assumptions made in the reading passage and presents three solid reasons to challenge them.
Firstly, the reading claims that artificial reefs creates a field for fish to gather and breed so, the fish numbers that can be caught will rise up. The professor casts doubt on this point by saying that reefs attract fish to them and it makes fish to congregate in a single location. As a result, since the fish crowd is in one place, their possibility to be caught will rise. He states this approach acts conversely and fish numbers decline rather than going up.
Secondly, the article posits that by creating private artificial reefs in secret locations, small-scale fishers would have a chance to compete with large corporations in the industry.
- Palm oil a liquid produced by palm trees and used for cooking and other purposes has become very popular in recent years As a result the palm oil industry has had a dramatic impact on the economies and landscapes of countries in which it operates When ask 76
- In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explore 80
- Advantages of Airships over other aircrafts Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories presented in the reading passage 88
- it is better to keep our old friends than to make new ones do you agree or disagree 70
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is Thus the projec 80
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...three solid reasons to challenge them. Firstly, the reading claims that artific...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... numbers decline rather than going up. Secondly, the article posits that by cre...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 1373.03311258 64% => OK
No of words: 172.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09302325581 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55311345577 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 419.366225166 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2468904511 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417506385464 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15719966866 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115598733905 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26489322094 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00979022765802 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...three solid reasons to challenge them. Firstly, the reading claims that artific...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... numbers decline rather than going up. Secondly, the article posits that by cre...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 1373.03311258 64% => OK
No of words: 172.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09302325581 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55311345577 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 419.366225166 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2468904511 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417506385464 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15719966866 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115598733905 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26489322094 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00979022765802 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.