It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishments should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
The young ones need to differentiate between correct and incorrect. Although some people recommend that a penalty is essential for the kids to understand this, I disagree entirely. Nevertheless, the elders should punish them to benefit the children.
On the one hand, there are two reasons why punishment does not work. Firstly, it causes many horrors in children and kills their sense of agency, so they can not believe what they do or think. Secondly, every time they make a mistake, punishment may harm their self-confidence and make them feel they are not good enough. They can not learn from their mistakes, and as they grow up, they will not develop their abilities because they fear punishment.
On the other hand, punishment should be replaced in a positive way, which has been suggested recently by new researchers. To begin with, when a child does something wrong, it is better to warn them first; if they repeat it, then we will not give children anything children like to do. For example, if a child loves to play computer games, we can impose a time limit on usage, which can be highly effective. In this way, we have taught them what is wrong or right. Moreover, they have learned that repeating mistakes have consequences for them and should be careful about it.
To conclude, a simple punishment is an excellent trick to maintain discipline and works well for everyone. It is recommended to consider having in-depth knowledge of child psychology before taking any further
step.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-03 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | minhnhat230602 | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 67
- The chart below shows the Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows how a biofuel called ethanol is produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the UK the rest of Europe and Japan from 1993 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...her hand, punishment should be replaced in a positive way, which has been suggested recently by n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92490118577 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66444795658 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644268774704 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0386793425 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231824285862 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835257231306 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614181558973 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134230615469 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571703483488 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.