A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
Education is an indispensable criterion for the development of a nation. So, every nation should have a solid foundation of education system, at least up to the college level, for its people. But there was a long-time question remains whether the national curriculum should be same for all its students. I mostly disagree with the prompt mentioned above that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. There are basically two reasons behind it.
To begin, we should keep in mind that not all the students have the same talent, potential and skill in all subjects. So, isn’t it would be discriminating to judge all the students in same standards? For example, if a student get 95% marks on mathematics but fail to score the pass marks for english literature, should it be a good judgement to disallow him to promote to next standard? A student should be judge according to his ability in his particular interest. If not, eventually a significant number of students will lose their interest in study.
Secondly, what a nation needs is actually to have skilled workforce in every field who can row the hull of development of the nation. According to study, growth of the skilled workforce significantly dependent on the education system a nation offers. If the students are not affectionate to the curriculum, then they will loose the interest in academics.
Of course, the implementation of a distinct curriculum according to one’s interest will be a tough job. But it will be worthy enough to reduce the disaffection and eventually the percentage of drop out from the early education. So, that is why I disagree with the prompt.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-22 | Ataraxia-m | 58 | view |
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- It is more harmful to compromise one s own beliefs than to adhere to them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'judged'?
Suggestion: judged
...e to next standard? A student should be judge according to his ability in his particu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...onate to the curriculum, then they will loose the interest in academics. Of course,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, second, secondly, so, then, at least, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95104895105 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91506077874 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531468531469 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9693707682 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319885245734 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105798405064 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945056974548 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180157101515 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108591869483 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'judged'?
Suggestion: judged
...e to next standard? A student should be judge according to his ability in his particu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...onate to the curriculum, then they will loose the interest in academics. Of course,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, second, secondly, so, then, at least, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95104895105 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91506077874 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531468531469 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9693707682 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319885245734 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105798405064 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945056974548 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180157101515 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108591869483 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.