Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
In this modern world, technology has become more and more forthcoming, which has led to the trend that a myriad of adults and the young stay at home and commence to work and learn through online platforms. From my perspective, this definitely an adverse tendency as it triggers a multitude of issues.
First and foremost, the health of both youngsters and adults can be deteriorated. To work and to study online means that people have to be exposed to the computer or any smart device's screen, which results in worsened eyesight and more bespectacled people is the testament to this consequence. Second, this trend degenerates the maturing of children. Frequent exposure to computer screens contributes to obesity in the young, especially adolescents as they are in the period of changing into adults, and their bodies do not functionally work. On the other hand, this trend encourages the immature one to be addicted to computer games. It is this culprit that leads to aggressive behavior in some children. Last but not least, the relationship between people is debased due to the heavy reliance on digital-based devices. People fancy chatting with their friends but detest meeting face to face for some reason such as bad appearance or laziness.
The opposite side may put forward a view that online platforms also provide an application to assist people in meeting directly like video calls. However, this thinking is flawed because almost all the applications supply users with filters in order to make them more good-looking, which causes false impressions among people.
In conclusion, in spite of the merits of online working and learning, the demerits of that outweigh the counterpart. Personally, I prefer studying with interaction among people and I highly recommend others to adopt the similar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Nguyen144202 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | oanh2020 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | maidiem.1508 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | thanhbinh | 61 | view |
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor others think it has an opposite effect discuss both views and give your opinions 73
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 84
- The diagrams below give information about two road tunnels in two Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The arena technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor others think is has an opposite effect discuss both views and give your opinions 73
- he chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should sp
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, look, may, second, so, in conclusion, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20819112628 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84292351641 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617747440273 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0672695264 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208311071379 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059680750621 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596526333142 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117738936577 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835229833944 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.