The line graphs below compare how much money spent annually on cell phone services, national and international fixed-line services in the US from 2001 to 2010.
It is clear that 2 out of 3 lines had an obvious change, while the international fixed-line services unaltered. During the period, cell phone services increased significantly, the opposite was true for national fixed-line services.
In 2001, cell phone services had a starting point lower than 2 another lines at 200 dollars annually. Opposite with the highest line is national landline services nearly 700 dollars at the same time. The most dramatic change is the average annual money spent on mobile and national fixed-line services all around 500 dollars in 2006. After 4 years, mobile services reached a peak of 720 dollars in 2010. Whereas the most popular line in 2001 decreased considerably above 450 dollars per year.
At last, the international communication services had not changed too much over the period shown.In 2001, international services had started at only 260$ .Perhaps that 310 dollars per annum was the maximum amount of money spent on this line in 2003. But then this queue always around 300 dollars over the past throughout the following years.
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 78
- Percentage of total music sales by method 78
- Percentage of people going to the cinema in a European country on different days 73
- Money Spent on Books 73
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015
Pls omit “over the past” in…
Pls omit “over the past” in the last sentence. I write it for people who will see my essay latter
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e services in the US from 2001 to 2010. It is clear that 2 out of 3 lines had an...
^^^
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... phone services increased significantly, the opposite was true for national fixed...
^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... reached a peak of 720 dollars in 2010. Whereas the most popular line in 2001 decreased...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... changed too much over the period shown.In 2001, international services had starte...
^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$260'.
Suggestion: $260
...ernational services had started at only 260$ .Perhaps that 310 dollars per annum was...
^^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tional services had started at only 260$ .Perhaps that 310 dollars per annum was t...
^^
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Perhaps
...onal services had started at only 260$ .Perhaps that 310 dollars per annum was the maxi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.165 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70495378888 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7191953957 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299624644384 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132444319389 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833307483208 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204717997002 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068389237959 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.